<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: but&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oxgoad.ca/2009/08/01/but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oxgoad.ca/2009/08/01/but/</link>
	<description>fundamentalism by blunt instrument</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:45:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Bouey</title>
		<link>http://oxgoad.ca/2009/08/01/but/comment-page-1/#comment-3803</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Bouey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 12:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oxgoad.ca/2009/08/01/but/#comment-3803</guid>
		<description>One of the things I despise about Graham&#039;s compromise is that he waters down the Gospel. If he was preaching it &quot;according to the Scriptures&quot;, he would never fit in with the Catholics and the liberals.

About 12 years ago, I started volunteering at the Gospel Mission (where I am now working), and we had many of Graham&#039;s Decision magazines donated. I went through them carefully to see if they actually contained &quot;the Gospel&quot; - they did not! Sure, one magazine at Easter focussed on Jesus&#039; death and suffering - but not how He paid the Full penalty for our sins, nor how belief in His resurrection was imporant. If 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 defines what the Gospel is, Billy Graham&#039;s magazine falls woefully short! The other magazines were the same - nothing in them to make a distinction or clarification between the true gospel and false ones, not one single magazine in the ones I read preached the gospel fully or clearly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things I despise about Graham&#8217;s compromise is that he waters down the Gospel. If he was preaching it &#8220;according to the Scriptures&#8221;, he would never fit in with the Catholics and the liberals.</p>
<p>About 12 years ago, I started volunteering at the Gospel Mission (where I am now working), and we had many of Graham&#8217;s Decision magazines donated. I went through them carefully to see if they actually contained &#8220;the Gospel&#8221; &#8211; they did not! Sure, one magazine at Easter focussed on Jesus&#8217; death and suffering &#8211; but not how He paid the Full penalty for our sins, nor how belief in His resurrection was imporant. If 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 defines what the Gospel is, Billy Graham&#8217;s magazine falls woefully short! The other magazines were the same &#8211; nothing in them to make a distinction or clarification between the true gospel and false ones, not one single magazine in the ones I read preached the gospel fully or clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

