<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: twisting the tail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oxgoad.ca/2010/01/27/twisting-the-tail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oxgoad.ca/2010/01/27/twisting-the-tail/</link>
	<description>fundamentalism by blunt instrument</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 05:45:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://oxgoad.ca/2010/01/27/twisting-the-tail/comment-page-1/#comment-4889</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oxgoad.ca/2010/01/27/twisting-the-tail/#comment-4889</guid>
		<description>Don, thanks for the long post and the work that went into it.  It was an interesting read.  I don&#039;t mind receiving the fundamentalist label.  I stopped disassociating myself personally with the label, however, when I concluded that a fundamentalist historically was interdenominational.  That wasn&#039;t strong enough for me.  I don&#039;t see it to be submissive enough to the doctrine of separation as seen in Scripture.  I call myself a fundamentalist by dictionary definition, which is &#039;strongly adhering to a standard.&#039;  That&#039;s why I am a fundamentalist in idea in that sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, thanks for the long post and the work that went into it.  It was an interesting read.  I don&#8217;t mind receiving the fundamentalist label.  I stopped disassociating myself personally with the label, however, when I concluded that a fundamentalist historically was interdenominational.  That wasn&#8217;t strong enough for me.  I don&#8217;t see it to be submissive enough to the doctrine of separation as seen in Scripture.  I call myself a fundamentalist by dictionary definition, which is &#8216;strongly adhering to a standard.&#8217;  That&#8217;s why I am a fundamentalist in idea in that sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

